The Great Rooted Bed
The Odyssey Book 23
Navigating the passages between books and being
“There is our pact and pledge, our secret sign, / built into that bed—my handiwork and no one else’s! / An old trunk of olive grew like a pillar on the building plot, / and I laid out our bedroom round that tree... / But if someone’s lopped it off at the roots— / I cannot say for certain any more!”
Dear friends,
Book 23 of Homer's The Odyssey is one of ancient literature’s most emotionally powerful and psychologically sophisticated explorations of marriage, recognition, and reunion after prolonged separation. This extraordinary chapter brings the epic’s domestic narrative to its emotional climax through the long-awaited reunion between Odysseus and Penelope, transforming what could have been a simple recognition scene into a profound meditation on trust, identity, and the nature of intimate relationships. The book operates simultaneously as the culmination of twenty years of separation and as a realistic portrayal of how genuine partnerships must be rebuilt rather than simply resumed after traumatic disruption.
The significance of Book 23 extends far beyond its immediate function as the resolution of the epic’s central relationship to encompass Homer’s most complete exploration of what constitutes authentic recognition between intimate partners. Unlike the physical identification that characterized Eurycleia’s recognition or the dramatic revelation through capability that marked the bow contest, the reunion between husband and wife requires a deeper form of recognition that operates through shared knowledge, emotional truth, and mutual testing that validates not just identity but the continuation of the relationship itself.
Moreover, Book 23 serves as the epic’s definitive statement about the nature of marriage as a partnership built on shared experience, mutual respect, and complementary wisdom rather than mere romantic sentiment or social convention. Through Penelope’s careful testing of Odysseus and his appreciative response to her strategic thinking, Homer creates a model of marital relationship that honors both partners’ intelligence and agency while demonstrating how genuine intimacy depends on qualities that transcend physical attraction or social obligation.
Book 23 opens with Eurycleia rushing to inform Penelope that Odysseus has returned and has slaughtered all the suitors. The old nurse’s breathless announcement of the miraculous news demonstrates both her joy at the restoration of legitimate authority and her understanding of what this means for the household’s future. Her detailed account of the night’s events provides Penelope with the information necessary to understand the dramatic transformation that has occurred during her absence from the hall.
Penelope’s initial response to Eurycleia’s news reveals the psychological sophistication that distinguishes Homer’s character development. Rather than immediate joy or relief, she responds with skepticism and caution, questioning whether the stranger could truly be her husband or whether some god might be deceiving her through supernatural disguise. Her reluctance to believe what she desperately wants to be true demonstrates both the protective mechanisms developed during twenty years of disappointed hopes and the wisdom necessary to distinguish authentic recognition from wishful thinking.
The queen’s insistence on seeing the evidence for herself before accepting such extraordinary claims shows the same strategic thinking that has characterized her handling of the suitors throughout their occupation of the palace. Her refusal to be rushed into premature acceptance, even of news she longs to hear, demonstrates mature judgment that places truth above immediate emotional satisfaction. Her caution serves both to protect herself from potential disappointment and to ensure that any recognition will be based on genuine evidence rather than desperate hope.
Eurycleia’s frustrated response to her mistress’s skepticism reveals the nurse’s more straightforward emotional response while highlighting the contrast between servants’ and principals’ different stakes in the outcome. The old nurse’s insistence that she has personally verified Odysseus’s identity through the scar provides concrete evidence while demonstrating how different forms of recognition operate for different relationships and purposes.
Penelope’s descent to the hall creates one of ancient literature’s most dramatically charged scenes, as husband and wife encounter each other after twenty years of separation under circumstances that make immediate recognition both possible and fraught with complexity. Her positioning herself across from Odysseus in silence demonstrates both her continued uncertainty and her strategic approach to this crucial moment, as she observes and evaluates rather than rushing to conclusions.
The extended silence between husband and wife creates extraordinary dramatic tension while allowing Homer to explore the psychological complexity of reunion after traumatic separation. Penelope’s careful observation of the stranger who claims to be her husband, her weighing of physical evidence against her accumulated doubts and fears, demonstrates how profound recognition requires more than simple identification to encompass emotional and intellectual acceptance of radically transformed circumstances.
Telemachus’s impatient criticism of his mother’s cold response reveals generational differences in understanding intimate relationships while providing opportunities for both parents to articulate their perspectives. His inability to comprehend his mother’s caution shows youthful inexperience with the complexities of long-term relationships while his defense of his father demonstrates his own developing loyalty and judgment.
Penelope’s response to her son’s criticism reveals both her continued uncertainty and her sophisticated understanding of what genuine recognition requires. Her acknowledgment that if this man is truly Odysseus, they possess private signs known only to themselves establishes the framework for the recognition that will follow. Her insistence on verification through shared intimate knowledge rather than public evidence demonstrates understanding that marital recognition operates according to different standards than other forms of identification.
Odysseus’s practical response to the immediate situation—his concern about potential retaliation from the suitors’ relatives and his strategic planning for managing the aftermath of the slaughter—demonstrates how leadership responsibilities continue even during moments of personal significance. His recognition that the night’s violence has created political problems requiring careful management shows mature understanding of how personal and political concerns intersect for those in positions of authority.
The implementation of Odysseus’s plan to create the appearance of normal wedding festivities through music and dancing demonstrates strategic thinking about public perception and political positioning. The ruse serves to delay discovery of the slaughter while Odysseus establishes his authority more completely, showing how effective leadership requires attention to timing and public opinion as well as to the exercise of force.
The domestic interlude where Odysseus bathes and is transformed by Athena into his more youthful appearance serves both practical functions—making him more physically recognizable—and symbolic purposes related to the restoration of his essential nature. The divine enhancement of his appearance demonstrates how supernatural favor supports those who have demonstrated virtue while preparing for the intimate recognition that requires both physical and emotional dimensions.
The famous test of the bed provides the mechanism for final, definitive recognition while serving as the chapter’s central symbol for the unique nature of marital intimacy. Penelope’s strategic claim that she has moved their marriage bed—which Odysseus built around a living olive tree, making it impossible to move without destroying it—creates a test that only her true husband could fail. Her apparent acceptance of the bed’s mobility serves to provoke the response that will validate his identity conclusively.
Odysseus’s immediate, passionate response to the suggestion that the bed has been moved provides the definitive proof of his identity while revealing the depths of his attachment to the physical symbol of their marriage. His detailed description of constructing the bed around the rooted olive tree, his technical explanation of its unmovable nature, and his distress at the thought of its destruction demonstrate intimate knowledge that could not be counterfeited or obtained through deception.
The symbolism of the rooted bed serves multiple thematic functions: it represents the stability and permanence of their marriage despite twenty years of separation, it embodies the organic nature of their relationship that grew from living roots rather than being artificially constructed, and it demonstrates how genuine partnerships require foundations that cannot be easily moved or destroyed. The bed’s connection to the living tree also suggests how marriage should be grounded in natural growth and authentic connection rather than mere social convention.
Penelope’s response to Odysseus’s passionate defense of the bed—her dissolving into tears and her rush to embrace him—represents the emotional climax of the entire epic. Her acknowledgment that his knowledge of their secret proves his identity definitively shows how genuine recognition between intimate partners operates through shared private knowledge rather than public evidence. Her explanation that she tested him from fear of deception demonstrates both the wisdom of her caution and the joy of finally accepting what she has longed to believe.
The reunion scene itself demonstrates Homer’s sophisticated understanding of how intimate relationships function, as the couple’s embrace involves both physical joy and emotional catharsis. The comparison of Penelope clinging to Odysseus to a shipwrecked sailor reaching land reverses expected gender roles while emphasizing how both partners have endured their own forms of dangerous voyaging during their separation.
The extended conversation between husband and wife following their initial reunion demonstrates how genuine reconciliation requires more than emotional catharsis to encompass practical communication about experiences, challenges, and future plans. Odysseus’s prophecy about further trials ahead—his journey to appease Poseidon—creates realistic expectations about their future while demonstrating how even successful reunion does not eliminate all challenges or create simple happily-ever-after endings.
Penelope’s response to news of future challenges shows both her disappointment that their trials are not completely finished and her mature acceptance that life involves continuing difficulties even after major problems are resolved. Her pragmatic approach to future challenges demonstrates the same wisdom and resilience that enabled her survival during Odysseus’s absence while showing how strong partnerships prepare couples to face continuing challenges together.
Athena’s intervention to extend the night provides divine validation for the couple’s reunion while creating practical space for the intimate conversation and rest they need. The goddess’s manipulation of time demonstrates how divine favor supports those who have demonstrated virtue while serving narrative functions related to providing adequate time for complex emotional and practical reconciliation.
The chapter’s conclusion with the couple retiring to their rooted bed provides symbolic closure to the epic’s domestic narrative while suggesting how genuine partnerships resume through return to shared spaces and practices that embody their relationship’s essential nature. Their reunion in the marriage bed built around the living olive tree represents not just physical intimacy but the restoration of the organic, rooted partnership that has survived despite prolonged separation and dramatic challenges.
Literary Analysis
Recognition and Intimate Knowledge
Book 23 represents ancient literature’s most sophisticated exploration of recognition between intimate partners, demonstrating how marital identification operates according to different standards than other forms of recognition. While Eurycleia’s physical identification of the scar and the suitors’ recognition of Odysseus through his archery prowess served their respective purposes, Penelope requires proof that operates through shared private knowledge inaccessible to others.
The test of the bed demonstrates Homer’s understanding that genuine intimacy creates forms of knowledge that cannot be counterfeited or obtained through deception. The secret of the bed’s construction—known only to Odysseus, Penelope, and one trusted servant—provides verification that transcends physical appearance or demonstrated capability to encompass the shared history and private experiences that define intimate relationships.
Penelope’s careful testing before accepting Odysseus’s identity shows wisdom rather than coldness, as she recognizes that authentic recognition must be distinguished from supernatural deception or desperate wishful thinking. Her strategic approach to this crucial moment demonstrates how profound relationships require verification processes that honor both emotional desires and intellectual integrity.
The chapter’s exploration of recognition also operates through the emotional and intellectual rapport that develops during the couple’s extended conversation following their reunion. Their ability to communicate about complex experiences, their mutual understanding of each other’s references and concerns, and their complementary approaches to problem-solving all demonstrate how genuine recognition between intimate partners encompasses more than simple identification to include validation of continued compatibility and shared understanding.
Marriage as Partnership
Book 23 presents one of ancient literature’s most egalitarian and psychologically realistic portrayals of marriage as a partnership between intellectual and moral equals. The relationship between Odysseus and Penelope demonstrates mutual respect, complementary capabilities, and shared decision-making that transcends conventional ancient gender hierarchies to create a model of marital relationship based on genuine partnership rather than patriarchal dominance.
Odysseus’s appreciation for Penelope’s strategic test of the bed reveals respect for her intelligence and judgment that distinguishes their relationship from conventional ancient marriages. His recognition that her caution demonstrated wisdom rather than disloyalty shows understanding that effective partnerships require both partners to maintain independent judgment while remaining committed to their relationship.
Penelope’s own demonstration of strategic thinking—her careful testing, her management of the suitors during Odysseus’s absence, her practical approach to future challenges—establishes her as an intellectual equal whose contributions to their partnership involve more than domestic management or emotional support. Her capabilities in strategic thinking and political maneuvering complement Odysseus’s own skills while demonstrating how effective partnerships leverage both partners’ strengths.
The chapter’s portrayal of their conversation following reunion demonstrates how genuine partnerships require ongoing communication about experiences, feelings, and plans rather than assuming automatic understanding or resumption of previous patterns. Their extended discussion about past trials and future challenges shows how strong relationships adapt to changed circumstances through honest communication and mutual support.
The Symbolism of the Rooted Bed
The marriage bed built around the living olive tree serves as the chapter’s central symbol while operating on multiple levels of meaning simultaneously. On the most obvious level, it represents the permanence and stability of Odysseus and Penelope’s marriage despite twenty years of separation and dramatic challenges. The bed’s immovable nature demonstrates how genuine partnerships create foundations that cannot be easily disrupted or destroyed by external circumstances.
The bed’s organic connection to the living tree suggests how authentic marriage relationships should grow from natural roots rather than being artificially constructed according to social convention or temporary circumstances. The image of the bed growing around and incorporating the living olive—a tree sacred to Athena and symbol of peace, prosperity, and wisdom—creates associations between marital partnership and divine favor, natural growth, and enduring values.
The secret nature of the bed’s construction—known only to the couple and one trusted servant—emphasizes how genuine intimacy creates private spaces and knowledge that exist apart from public life and social observation. The bed’s status as a secret shared only between intimate partners demonstrates how authentic relationships require dimensions of privacy and exclusive mutual knowledge that distinguish them from other social bonds.
The bed’s immobility also serves practical narrative functions by creating the test through which Penelope can verify Odysseus’s identity definitively. Only someone with intimate knowledge of the bed’s construction could recognize the impossibility of moving it, making the test both clever and conclusive while operating through the kind of shared private knowledge that defines genuine intimacy.
Divine Intervention and Natural Emotion
Book 23 demonstrates Homer’s continued sophisticated integration of supernatural elements with realistic psychological and emotional development. Athena’s interventions—enhancing Odysseus’s appearance and extending the night to provide adequate time for reunion—operate within the epic’s framework of divine favor while respecting the natural emotional processes that genuine reconciliation requires.
The goddess’s enhancement of Odysseus’s appearance serves both to make him more immediately recognizable to his wife and to demonstrate divine approval for their reunion. However, the physical transformation enables rather than replaces the emotional and intellectual recognition that occurs through the test of the bed and their subsequent conversation. The divine assistance creates favorable conditions while respecting the human processes of trust, verification, and emotional reconnection.
Athena’s extension of the night provides practical space for the couple’s intimate conversation and physical reunion without rushing either the emotional catharsis or the practical communication necessary for genuine reconciliation. The manipulation of time demonstrates divine support for those who have maintained virtue while serving narrative functions related to providing adequate dramatic space for complex emotional resolution.
The chapter’s integration of supernatural and natural elements reflects broader ancient Greek theological concepts about how divine favor supports human relationships and natural processes rather than replacing them with miraculous interventions. The gods enable and validate genuine human emotions and choices while respecting the authentic psychological and social processes through which relationships function.
Gender, Agency, and Mutual Respect
Book 23’s portrayal of Penelope demonstrates sophisticated understanding of feminine agency and intelligence that transcends conventional ancient gender limitations. Her strategic testing of Odysseus, her careful evaluation of evidence, and her refusal to be rushed into premature acceptance all demonstrate intellectual capabilities that match her husband’s own strategic thinking.
The reversal of expected gender roles in the reunion scene—where Penelope is compared to a shipwrecked sailor reaching land while Odysseus provides the stable shore—demonstrates Homer’s willingness to challenge conventional gender associations when appropriate to emotional truth. The comparison acknowledges Penelope’s own form of dangerous voyaging during her twenty-year ordeal while suggesting how both partners have endured their own trials.
However, the chapter also operates within ancient Greek social structures where ultimate authority remains with the male head of household. Telemachus’s assertion of male prerogative in dismissing his mother from decisions about the bow contest and Odysseus’s strategic planning without consulting Penelope both reflect conventional gender hierarchies while showing how the couple’s mutual respect operates within rather than completely transcending their cultural context.
The chapter’s treatment of gender demonstrates both Homer’s sophisticated understanding of how genuine partnerships require mutual respect and intellectual equality and his location within ancient cultural frameworks that maintained conventional gender hierarchies in public and social spheres even while acknowledging more egalitarian dynamics in private marital relationships.
Historical and Cultural Context
Book 23 provides valuable insights into ancient Greek concepts of marriage, domestic life, and gender relationships while serving universal narrative functions related to love, trust, and reconciliation. The detailed attention to domestic spaces—bedrooms, baths, private chambers—illuminates how ancient elite households distinguished between public and private spheres while creating spaces for intimate relationships apart from political and social functions.
The chapter’s portrayal of marriage as involving both emotional bonds and practical partnerships reflects documented ancient practices where elite marriages served political and economic functions while also creating spaces for genuine affection and mutual support. The emphasis on shared knowledge, complementary capabilities, and mutual respect demonstrates how ancient marriages could encompass both conventional social functions and authentic intimate relationships.
The religious elements in the chapter—divine intervention, ritual purification, theological justification for events—correspond to ancient Greek religious practices while serving narrative functions within the epic’s fictional framework. The integration of supernatural assistance with realistic emotional and psychological development reflects ancient understanding of how divine and human spheres of influence intersected in personal relationships.
The material details about bed construction, household furnishings, and domestic practices provide insights into ancient elite living conditions while serving symbolic functions within the narrative framework. The rooted bed’s unique construction reflects actual ancient woodworking techniques while operating as literary symbol for marital permanence and stability.
Contemporary Relevance
The themes explored in Book 23 maintain profound relevance for contemporary readers dealing with challenges related to long-term relationships, reunion after separation, trust and verification, and the nature of genuine intimacy. The chapter’s exploration of how couples rebuild relationships after prolonged separation speaks directly to modern experiences involving military deployment, career demands, imprisonment, or other circumstances requiring extended time apart.
Penelope’s careful testing before accepting Odysseus’s identity provides insights relevant to contemporary concerns about trust, verification, and the challenge of distinguishing authentic connection from deception or wishful thinking. Her strategic approach to this crucial recognition demonstrates how wisdom sometimes requires resisting immediate emotional satisfaction in favor of genuine verification and authentic understanding.
The chapter’s portrayal of marriage as a partnership requiring ongoing communication, mutual respect, and shared decision-making offers models relevant to contemporary relationship challenges. The couple’s extended conversation about past experiences and future plans demonstrates how strong relationships adapt to changed circumstances through honest communication rather than assuming automatic resumption of previous patterns.
The symbolism of the rooted bed speaks to contemporary concerns about creating stable foundations for relationships in mobile, rapidly changing social environments. The image of marriage built around living roots suggests how authentic partnerships require organic growth and permanent foundations rather than easily disrupted arrangements based on temporary circumstances or surface attractions.
Perhaps most significantly, Book 23’s exploration of how genuine recognition between intimate partners requires more than physical presence or legal status speaks to contemporary understanding of what constitutes authentic relationship. The chapter demonstrates how true intimacy depends on shared knowledge, mutual understanding, and emotional connection that transcends surface identification to encompass the deeper dimensions of partnership and commitment.
The chapter’s realistic portrayal of reunion as requiring both emotional catharsis and practical communication offers insights for contemporary couples dealing with reintegration after separation. The acknowledgment that even successful reunion involves challenges and requires adjustment demonstrates mature understanding that relationship restoration is a process rather than an instantaneous event.
Conclusion
Book 23 of The Odyssey represents ancient literature’s most emotionally satisfying and psychologically sophisticated exploration of marital reunion after prolonged separation. The chapter’s transformation of what could have been a simple recognition scene into a profound meditation on trust, intimacy, and the nature of genuine partnership demonstrates Homer’s understanding that the greatest literature serves both immediate emotional needs and deeper reflection on enduring human concerns.
The famous test of the bed provides one of literature’s most perfect symbols for marital intimacy while serving practical narrative functions related to definitive recognition and emotional catharsis. The rooted bed’s multiple layers of meaning—permanence, natural growth, private knowledge, divine favor—create a symbol that operates successfully on both immediate and metaphorical levels while speaking to universal experiences of how genuine partnerships create stable foundations that survive dramatic challenges.
Penelope’s careful testing before accepting Odysseus’s identity demonstrates wisdom rather than coldness, showing how authentic recognition must be distinguished from wishful thinking or supernatural deception. Her strategic approach to this crucial moment reveals the same intelligence and capability that enabled her survival during twenty years of political pressure while demonstrating how strong partnerships respect both partners’ judgment and agency.
Odysseus’s appreciation for Penelope’s test and his passionate response to the suggestion that their bed has been moved reveal both his continuing love for his wife and his respect for her intelligence. His recognition that her caution demonstrated wisdom shows understanding that effective partnerships require both partners to maintain independent judgment while remaining committed to their relationship.
The extended conversation following their initial reunion demonstrates how genuine reconciliation requires more than emotional catharsis to encompass practical communication about experiences, concerns, and future plans. Their discussion of past trials and coming challenges shows how strong relationships prepare couples to face continuing difficulties together rather than creating false expectations of simple happily-ever-after endings.
The chapter’s integration of divine intervention with natural emotional processes demonstrates Homer’s sophisticated understanding of how supernatural and human elements can work together to support authentic relationships. Athena’s assistance creates favorable conditions while respecting the genuine psychological and emotional processes through which intimate partnerships function and heal.
As the epic approaches its final resolution, Book 23 provides the emotional climax that satisfies readers’ investment in Odysseus and Penelope’s relationship while demonstrating how genuine partnerships survive through mutual respect, shared wisdom, and foundations strong enough to withstand prolonged separation and dramatic challenges. The chapter rewards both immediate emotional engagement and careful reflection on what constitutes authentic intimacy and enduring partnership.
The enduring appeal of Book 23 lies in its successful demonstration that genuine recognition between intimate partners requires more than physical presence or legal status to encompass the shared knowledge, emotional connection, and mutual understanding that distinguish authentic partnership from mere social convention. Homer’s exploration of these themes through both immediate dramatic action and profound symbolic resonance creates a work that speaks to universal human experiences while maintaining its distinctive ancient Greek cultural identity.
Study Questions
Trust, Testing, and Authentic Recognition: Penelope’s careful testing of Odysseus before accepting his identity might seem cold or overly cautious, yet Homer presents it as wise and necessary. Why does genuine recognition between intimate partners require verification through shared private knowledge rather than physical evidence or public demonstration? What does Penelope’s strategic approach to this crucial moment reveal about the nature of trust in long-term relationships? How might her example provide guidance for contemporary situations involving reunion after separation, reconciliation after betrayal, or the challenge of distinguishing authentic connection from wishful thinking or deception?
Marriage as Equal Partnership: The relationship between Odysseus and Penelope demonstrates mutual respect, complementary capabilities, and shared decision-making that seems remarkably egalitarian for ancient literature. How does their partnership challenge or conform to conventional ancient Greek gender hierarchies? What does Odysseus’s appreciation for Penelope’s strategic test reveal about his understanding of effective marriage? How might their model of relationship—built on intellectual equality, mutual respect, and complementary strengths—provide insights for contemporary partnerships navigating questions about equality, independence, and mutual support?
The Symbolism of the Rooted Bed: The marriage bed built around the living olive tree serves as the chapter’s central symbol for the permanence, natural growth, and private intimacy that characterize Odysseus and Penelope’s relationship. What different meanings does this symbol carry, and how do they illuminate the nature of authentic partnership? What does the bed’s immovable nature suggest about what creates stable foundations for lasting relationships? How might this ancient symbol speak to contemporary concerns about creating permanent commitments in mobile, rapidly changing social environments, or about distinguishing authentic partnership from superficial or temporary connections?
Reading Assignment for Next Week
We will cover Book 24. In the Fagles translation, this chapter is titled Peace and spans pages 468-485. In the Wilson translation, this chapter is titled Restless Spirits and spans pages 507-525.
Here’s to the books that take us beyond the shelf and into deeper waters,
Matthew Long is a writer and retired sailor living in rural western Tennessee.
Beyond the Bookshelf is a reader-supported voyage. If these literary explorations have enriched your journey, I’d be grateful for any support you can offer. Whether it’s the price of a coffee or a book, your contribution keeps wind in our sails and ensures these navigations through literature remain free for all readers. Thank you for being part of this crew.
Affiliate links: You can click on the title of any book mentioned in this article to purchase your own copy. These are affiliate links from Bookshop.org, earning me a very small commission for any purchase you make.
Previous articles in this series:
If you are a new subscriber or missed any of the previous articles in this series, you can catch up at the link below:
Beyond the issue of Penelope's recognition that the beggar, is, indeed, her lost husband is a deeper search. What remains of the man she married. She has changed. Likely when Odysseus departed Ithaca they had been married only one year. She may have then been a girl of 15, and now she is an experienced woman of 35, perhaps. She knows that she has and has not changed. She knows that she is now a mature woman who has not known a man intimately for 20 years. The man she married had not yet been to war and has surely been changed on the plains of Troy and his long νόστος home. Can these different people connect not as newlyweds but as the people they have become.
Time changes people, there is not a way to be the same person we were ten years ago. Let alone 20. We might maintain (or think we maintain) the same operating morals and values, maybe kindness and care, but we are internally and externally different.
To want so much to be home, to have a spouse home. To wait, suffer, and grieve. To wonder when looking into their eyes, was this the one I committed my life to, how will it now be different?
Penelope is offered agency in this book, at a higher degree than denying the suitors. She has the power to observe, see, even decide if this man, Odysseus, is not just her spouse, but the man she married.
I appreciate the ongoing relationship-ability from past to current. Understanding as you write, "... the reunion between husband and wife requires a deeper form of recognition that operates through shared knowledge, emotional trust, and mutual testing that validates not just identity but the continuation of the relationship itself." This is true honor.